social.manolomartinez.net

The Albert-Krauss Exchange

Two very bright persons being an asshole. The physicist Lawrence Krauss writes a book, On the Origin of Everything, in which, he claims, the question of how it is that there is something rather than nothing is dealt with and answered. David Albert, a philosopher of science, writes this review, claiming that the nothingness Krauss starts with is full of relativistic quantum fields -- hardly nothing. Krauss, Albert suggests, is a petty nerd. Later, Krauss calls Albert moronic. All in all, very edifying.

Leaving aside the issue of manners, what do you guys think about the controversy? I have the impression that Albert is probably right, and there is a sense of emptiness which is important and according to which a universe with quantum fields is not empty.
I'll check it out, though my maths/physics skills are very rusty. The notion of emptiness is somewhat problematic for me, in general. I'll check it out.
Well, I tend to think that nothing is really nothing :) That empty space is not nothing is, as you say, very interesting, though.